Do most people feel that it is better to hike with two poles rather than just one?
Do most people feel that it is better to hike with two poles rather than just one?
Oh lord, you're going to get every answer under the sun.
Personally, I use two poles or none. I find it hard to get into a rhythm with one pole.
I use poles when speed hiking and/or high mileage days, but I don't use them if hiking at a slower pace and/or lower mileage days.
2 poles in steep or rough terrain, no poles in flat terrain. One pole does nothing for me.
Agree with the above posters. Two or none, but two more often than not.
One if by land..two if by sea...
Paul "Mags" Magnanti
http://pmags.com
Twitter: @pmagsco
Facebook: pmagsblog
The true harvest of my life is intangible...a little stardust caught,a portion of the rainbow I have clutched -Thoreau
one, or none, occassionally 2, but what's it matter - pole your own hike
Most people my age [69] needs 2 poles to hike.
one
I went Me-Va no poles and seriously regret it. My knees felt terrible by the end. I will be using 2 for every hike from now on.
ME-VA 08
soon to be GA-ME 09
praying for PCT 10
there's some real creativity amongst white blazers...
Check out my website: www.serialhiking.com
I used one pole for my first two long hikes (PCT and CDT), then switched to two for the AT and I'm glad I did. Two were good for the steeper grade and poorer tread. Now I'm back out West and I'm back to one pole again. I like having a hand free for map and compass work, which wasn't needed on the AT.
"Throw a loaf of bread and a pound of tea in an old sack and jump over the back fence." John Muir on expedition planning
I use one only for steep climbs and decents.
I like two poles myself. But my son used his big stick the whole way and I saw another guy using one staff. So it's up to you.
Let me sum up from previous threads;
poles suck....poles are great
Poles are for sheeple.....Only real hikers use poles
poles hurt your knees....poles save your knees
poles poke little holes in the trail and speed erosion....nuh uhhhh
I like poles....I hate poles
Well you suck.....you suck worser dummy
Ok lets stop all the name calling and stay on topic.
Be sure to buy good poles....Walmart poles are great
....................................
Since you can't get along this thread is closed.
Hope I didn't miss anything
If you find yourself in a fair fight; your tactics suck.
sd, you forgot... don't put down poles, it's discrimination
Here's an little story about my poles. It's probably not very interesting, but it's true. On a hike last year coming down a steep bit, I stumbled. Poles kept me from falling, but it was still a jarring stumble. My head kind of yanked to the left at an odd angle, and I felt a very definite click in my jaw. Continued on my hike and noticed increasing pain in my left ear, jaw and face. By the end of the day it was horrible. Over the next couple of days, it got worse, couldn't open my mouth all the way, hurt to chew even oatmeal.
As it happened, when I got home I had a dentist appointment. He says TMJ. I said, well, ok, but I sorta fell. He says TMJ. Dental insurance says: we won't pay, it's medical. Medical insurance says, we won't pay for anything related to chewing or clenching unless it's an accident. Yes. Well, I fell. It says so in my record. Insurance company says, "But you didn't hit the ground, so you didn't fall." I didn't hit the ground because I had the poles. Had I not had the poles and hit the ground, I could have broken some bones, needed stitches, crushed my skull, who knows. It would have cost more, but they'd have paid for that, apparently. But, since I didn't hit the ground, they say I didn't fall, hence no "accident". The fight goes on.
I sure am glad I pay those insurance fees.
Darn! There I go off-topic again!