WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 40 of 40
  1. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-14-2015
    Location
    Rome, Georgia
    Posts
    458

    Default

    700 feet elevation gain per miles is the toughest non-AT climbs I've done - both Tearbritches in Georgia's Cohutta Wilderness and the North Rim of the Grand Canyon, starting at Redwall Bridge, climb about 2,100 feet over three miles.

    700 feet per mile is darned tough.

    I've done the AT from Springer to The Scales in Grayson Highlands, Virginia. There is no three-mile stretch like those two. I don't think there's a two-mile stretch. The steepest climb I've done on the AT is Jacob's Ladder, which may approach 700 feet over a mile. The second steepest is probably Albert Mountain, but that's just one-third of a mile. Most of the other long, tough climbs are 500- to 600-feet per mile, I think included Wesser to Cheoah Bald. There's a big difference between 500-feet- and 700-feet per mile.

    The northbound climb up Roan Mountain used to have a fearsome reputation, but it had been modified by switchbacks when I arrived in 2015. It wasn't that bad (I'm guessing about 500-feet per mile). Before the modifications it must've been a booger bear.

    Bottom line is this: for me, at age 57, I don't worry about 300- or 400-feet per mile; I know 500- to 600-feet per mile over an extended distance will hurt; at 700-feet per mile, I "gird up my loins" for a bear of a climb.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    05-05-2011
    Location
    state of confusion
    Posts
    9,866
    Journal Entries
    1
    Last edited by MuddyWaters; 04-13-2018 at 20:12.

  3. #23
    Registered User BuckeyeBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-18-2012
    Location
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,445
    Journal Entries
    6

    Default

    If anyone has a copy of the 2013 Thru-Hiker's Companion, it shows a guy crawling up Katahdin with his hands and feet. Yes he was wearing a day pack.
    Blackheart

  4. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-12-2009
    Location
    Spring Lake, MI
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NCC1701 View Post
    ... percentage of the trail is more than a 45 degree ... incline or decline? ...weakness is my left knee. ... cortisone shot a year ago ...walking 5-10 miles several times a week with 30 lbs in my pack. I....
    You can do it... but you have to be realistic about how the cards are stacked against you...

    My last FOUR hiking companions got off the trail due to knee issues (1st...meniscus that hadn't been repaired enough ... he ended up with a full ACL replacement), 2nd - knee issues that weren't addressed, 3rd - history of meniscus surgery with some pain hiking later that was not addressed; 4th: former knee injury that was not confirmed as heeled prior to hiking.

    What I am getting at is... you may have had the correction 15 years ago, but if you had to have a shot last year (yes, I am familiar with that because my husband was one of those mentioned above who got a shot in the year prior...), your knee might not be able to handle it.

    It has no bearing on the "# of degrees up and down" - rather - it is about the amount of TIMES up and down. This past year, even I - who has NEVER had a knee issue, started feeling discomfort on the downs - enough that I purchased knee braces.

    If you are walking 5-10 miles several times a week in the flat-lander Texas (like Michigan), plan to walk 4-5 miles each day when you start the AT. Plan to spend three to four times the amount of time walking.

    Can you do it? Yes, but realize it will take getting used to and will take much more time... But, it is worth it!!!

  5. #25
    Registered User KDogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-30-2015
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    267

    Default

    Jacob's Ladder was the worst ascent that I remember. It sucked. It is flat and steep so you can't even get comfortable taking a break.

    I'm pretty sure it was Pinkham's Notch that was my worst descent. There is a campground at the bottom and it came at the end of our hiking day. The grade on the map doesn't really show the difficulty of that downhill. It's like walking down stairs except that each stair step is three feet high. If your knees can make it down this one they can complete the trail. What an ordeal.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDogg View Post
    Jacob's Ladder was the worst ascent that I remember. It sucked. It is flat and steep so you can't even get comfortable taking a break.

    I'm pretty sure it was Pinkham's Notch that was my worst descent. There is a campground at the bottom and it came at the end of our hiking day. The grade on the map doesn't really show the difficulty of that downhill. It's like walking down stairs except that each stair step is three feet high. If your knees can make it down this one they can complete the trail. What an ordeal.
    If you were Northbound I expect the section you are mentioning is the Osgood trail section from the top of Madison down to the Osgood tentsite. There are steeper sections in the whites but this trail is relentlessly steep but graded well enough that is can be walked down rather than scrambled down. It also is sustained elevation drop longer than most other sections of the AT in the whites. I think that makes a difference, if you observe someone scrambling down a steep slope that is paved with boulders like the Twinway from South Twin to Galehead, they usually are treating it as long series of uneven steps. I think most people with a pack on are taking individual steps and with a very short break in between steps. They can stop after each step. Where the knee damage can occur is when the person is running down the slope where the hiker is carrying momentum and can not readily stop after every step.

  7. #27

    Default

    It's not useful to talk about angles like 45 degrees... In nature slopes fail if they are above the angle of repose of about 33 degrees. The materials are rarely strong enough to hold themselves up at steeper angles (for long; an exception is young glacial canyon walls). The steepest mountains generally are young volcanos, whose sides are almost exactly 33 degrees. Yeah I know that dr wikipedia has a different answer...

  8. #28

    Join Date
    05-05-2011
    Location
    state of confusion
    Posts
    9,866
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RockDoc View Post
    It's not useful to talk about angles like 45 degrees... In nature slopes fail if they are above the angle of repose of about 33 degrees. The materials are rarely strong enough to hold themselves up at steeper angles (for long; an exception is young glacial canyon walls). The steepest mountains generally are young volcanos, whose sides are almost exactly 33 degrees. Yeah I know that dr wikipedia has a different answer...
    Yosemite+National+Park+in+California.jpg

    The tops of most mountains are rock outcroppings, and considerable steeper than flanks of eroded fill, and can be quite vertical.

    USA Grand Canyon South Rim.jpg
    Which is why we do have steep trails, and double black diamond ski runs from 35-50 degrees for short distances.


    Screenshot_20180414-064052.png
    Solid rock has no angle of repose

    But as i linked to guthooks analysis above, steepest section of AT approaches 2000'/mile for half mile out of pinkham notch. All been discussed before. No one wants to search.

    Modern trailbuilding attempts to limit to 7-8% grade, about 400'/mile . Studies have shown people walk that most efficiently.
    Last edited by MuddyWaters; 04-14-2018 at 08:04.

  9. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-18-2010
    Location
    NJ
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,133
    Images
    1

    Default

    the cutoff line used is 15%, as opposed to 45%, but this is the answer the OP was looking for-

    http://www.guthookhikes.com/2015/02/...t-pct-cdt.html

  10. #30
    Registered User egilbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-18-2014
    Location
    Lewiston and Biddeford, Maine
    Age
    61
    Posts
    2,643

    Default

    I did Osgood trail going South bound over Madison. The nobo hikers I talked to at Osgood Tentsite the night before were absolutely drained by the descent off of Madison. The worst descent I can recall after a long day was coming off the Bigelow's and stopping at Stafford Brook campsite.

  11. #31

    Default

    I find the "smoothness" of the trail on steep stretches to be more impactful to me, rather than just the grade. That is, if the trail is rocky and you have the chance to place your whole foot down flat once in a while, it helps. I think it was Jacobs Ladder (I have a crappy memory,) that I felt like I was perched up on the balls of my feet/toes for half an hour. Put a lot of pressure on my calves and Achilles tendons.

    Maybe I'm just not flexible enough.

  12. #32

    Default

    Crossing into Maine on the AT can get quite steep.

    https://youtu.be/tf3JXah7z14


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  13. #33
    Registered User KDogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-30-2015
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    267

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peakbagger View Post
    If you were Northbound I expect the section you are mentioning is the Osgood trail section from the top of Madison down to the Osgood tentsite. There are steeper sections in the whites but this trail is relentlessly steep but graded well enough that is can be walked down rather than scrambled down. It also is sustained elevation drop longer than most other sections of the AT in the whites. I think that makes a difference, if you observe someone scrambling down a steep slope that is paved with boulders like the Twinway from South Twin to Galehead, they usually are treating it as long series of uneven steps. I think most people with a pack on are taking individual steps and with a very short break in between steps. They can stop after each step. Where the knee damage can occur is when the person is running down the slope where the hiker is carrying momentum and can not readily stop after every step.
    Thanks for clarifying that! Still have bad thoughts thinking about it.

  14. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-12-2013
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Age
    29
    Posts
    95

    Default Steep parts of AT

    For northbounders, the descent into Duncannon, PA was the sketchiest of the trail in my opinion. It's super fine gravel on a crazy steep decline. Albert Mtn. in NC was pretty steep for a hot minute, as well as Kelly Knob in Georgia (NC?). After these two climbs, you will be getting those legs underneath you, and a steep climb will simply be a sopping wet inconvenience, nothing more.

  15. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-18-2010
    Location
    NJ
    Age
    48
    Posts
    3,133
    Images
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Martzy13 View Post
    For northbounders, the descent into Duncannon, PA was the sketchiest of the trail in my opinion. It's super fine gravel on a crazy steep decline. Albert Mtn. in NC was pretty steep for a hot minute, as well as Kelly Knob in Georgia (NC?). After these two climbs, you will be getting those legs underneath you, and a steep climb will simply be a sopping wet inconvenience, nothing more.
    i think guthook needs to make a new chart... steepest AT climbs south of... glencliffe? greylock?

    it would be illuminating, in part, to see just how much steeper, by his measure, the whites are.

  16. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Martzy13 View Post
    For northbounders, the descent into Duncannon, PA was the sketchiest of the trail in my opinion. It's super fine gravel on a crazy steep decline. Albert Mtn. in NC was pretty steep for a hot minute, as well as Kelly Knob in Georgia (NC?). After these two climbs, you will be getting those legs underneath you, and a steep climb will simply be a sopping wet inconvenience, nothing more.
    I believe that there may have been a reroute since you did the Duncannon descent. It's now a kitten, a bolder filled stairway of limestone. Although for anyone reading, after the vista lookout before descending, keep hiking toward the river and you'll see what he's talking about. It's sketchy in some parts but a fun way down the mountain.

    There's a non-At trail here in PA, the chuck keipler, that otherwise is absolutely fantastic except for a few descents that have nothing under you except forest duft (or mud). Short 200 foot descents are terrifying. So yes, trail maintenance is utmost importance to safeness in steepness. There's another one called 1000 steps (that's actually closer to 1500) that may be closer to your 45 degrees that I've ever seen, but it is also a joy to go up. Not so much to go down, but you'll remember it for the next week guaranteed.

  17. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-11-2018
    Location
    Mt Pleasant, Texas
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Great info.

    Quote Originally Posted by tdoczi View Post
    the cutoff line used is 15%, as opposed to 45%, but this is the answer the OP was looking for-

    http://www.guthookhikes.com/2015/02/...t-pct-cdt.html

  18. #38

    Default

    There are a few near vertical climbs or descents in Vt, NH, and ME. They tend to be short, a few 100 feet so they don't show up on profile maps. I find the long, drawn out descents to be more damaging.
    Follow slogoen on Instagram.

  19. #39
    13-45 Section Hiker Trash
    Join Date
    04-09-2008
    Location
    Lynchburg, VA
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,080
    Images
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NCC1701 View Post
    I thought the thread "Any specific training to help with knee pain from descents " was a good one and didn't want to hijack the post so I will ask my question here for those who have been there;

    In your estimation, what percentage of the trail is more than a 45 degree (just an arbitrary number) incline or decline? I want to hike it next year and my weakness is my left knee. I had a torn meniscus about 15 years ago which was corrected with surgery. I also had a cortisone shot a year ago which also helped greatly. I am walking 5-10 miles several times a week with 30 lbs in my pack. I'm not a runner but I can jog 3 miles or so on my treadmill with no problems. My stamina and legs are definitely getting stronger. Watching YouTube videos I see lots of level ground and slight inclines which would be no problem. So being concerned about what I would be facing, how much of the trail is actually step ascents and descents that would test my knee? Many thanks.
    I think what you really want to know is how will your knee do. I've had lots of nagging issues with my knees as have a lot of folks here. The main things that will get you are not necessarily always steep stuff. Cumulative ups an downs can get ya too. So if you do a lot of miles where you are going up and down several times a day that can cause a problem. Another gotcha is that there a many long descents on the AT that aren't particularly steep, but the length of them can cause issues. So anyway, just throwing that out there for your consideration.
    AT: 2007-2019 (45 sections)
    JMT: 2013

  20. #40
    Registered User One Half's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-05-2010
    Location
    in a bus
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peakbagger View Post
    If you were Northbound I expect the section you are mentioning is the Osgood trail section from the top of Madison down to the Osgood tentsite. There are steeper sections in the whites but this trail is relentlessly steep but graded well enough that is can be walked down rather than scrambled down. It also is sustained elevation drop longer than most other sections of the AT in the whites. I think that makes a difference, if you observe someone scrambling down a steep slope that is paved with boulders like the Twinway from South Twin to Galehead, they usually are treating it as long series of uneven steps. I think most people with a pack on are taking individual steps and with a very short break in between steps. They can stop after each step. Where the knee damage can occur is when the person is running down the slope where the hiker is carrying momentum and can not readily stop after every step.
    Just have to mention that a friend of mine adopted that section a number of years ago and we would help maintain it - from the tentsite up to the split? It was just over a mile IIRC and had a very large number of water bars, more when we were done than when we started actually. What a beast that section is!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    https://tinyurl.com/MyFDresults

    A vigorous five-mile walk will do more good for an unhappy but otherwise healthy adult than all the medicine and psychology in the world. ~Paul Dudley White

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •