The good side of those "Must See" lists is, that the masses rush there and the rest of the world is in peace.
The Camino for example is so terribly crowded, that they developed special techniques to take a leak during hiking without offending too much (there seems to be constantly flocks of hikers passing, and no woods to sneak into).
Wherelse the Via Dinarica is very new and at places not higly developed nor marked, to a level where there is plenty room for adventure, as far as fiddlehead's report goes.
The Kungsladen has been a bucket list item for years. I'd like to hike it for my 50th birthday.
Looking over this list makes me wonder again why so many people hike the AT when there are so many, so much more spectacular options around the world. . . albeit options without so many people and so much trail culture.
I'm not lost. I'm exploring.
And it was put together by Elvis, I'm sure. ;-)
The problem with suggesting there is a "better" secret list is that for any established long distance trail to be successfully developed and maintained, there has to be a lot of people working on and maintaining it and thus it would not be both an established long distance trail and a secret. That being said, there are surely many not-so-established routes (i.e. not designated trail systems) that can be put together though stunning and beautiful areas, but then it doesn't make a very clean list if the routes are loosely defined.
I'm not lost. I'm exploring.
Many other trails in east just as close.
Its because AT is EASY. Theres no unknowns at all. And theres always plenty other people around for those that are actually scared to be alone , which is 90+% of hikers imo.
Shelters, privys, profile maps showing every water source and place to camp, frequent road crossings in densely inhabited region, excellent cell service, no untamed water crossings rhat depend on weather (at least south of maine), no navigation or route finding needed, short distances between towns, huge hiker support business and shuttle structure. Bottom line, the AT is a safe, low-risk, easy trail for the inexperienced avg hiker. And we wont even mention the party crowd.
Last edited by MuddyWaters; 04-15-2018 at 10:55.
When I said that folks needed to do a modicum of self directed personal research before asking to be spoon fed at WhiteBlaze I got flamed.
One of my favorites: "I'm planning a section hike of Georgia. Where should I send mail drops between Neel Gap and Hiawassee, GA?"
No worries. Everyone learns differently.
Wayne
Eddie Valiant: "That lame-brain freeway idea could only be cooked up by a toon."
https://wayne-ayearwithbigfootandbubba.blogspot.com
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
I guess we need a definition of "long trail".
Wayne
Eddie Valiant: "That lame-brain freeway idea could only be cooked up by a toon."
https://wayne-ayearwithbigfootandbubba.blogspot.com
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
But then we would also need a definition of thru hike ;-)
Some of these trails are mandated, marked and maintained, as the AT. Others are just an arbitrary amalgamation of trails with a name attached to it. The Great Himalayan Trail is just one (or two) specific paths out of thousands of miles of trails that have been used by locals for thousands of years. So there is nothing to stop you from creating your own long trail. It's just marketing.
For those who want spectacular mountains with no shelters, resupply towns, tourists, bridges, cell phone service, decent maps, guide books, marked trails, etc..., check out the Pamir Mountains of Tajikistan. It's on my bucket list.