Originally Posted by
Uncle Joe
In our usage areas it's not so much compaction as run-off. We try to build trail that avoids fall-line and steep drops. Multi-use is considerably different than the AT, which often goes straight up and down a hill. For multi-use and sustainability this isn't the best way to cut trail. The AT has only one real use so it mitigates it a little. That said, back to the point. The most common reason we re-route isn't impaction but rather rutting and water damage. Often that is due to compaction or misuse or just longevity. Sometimes you can't help but go straight down at times with trail but over time, and in time, that will have to be addressed. You just deal with it in an area where there is no option. That said, even compressed and impacted areas will recover. If there are trees over head shedding leaves or needles, it will. It just takes time. No doubt it would be better to break that up but it's not imperative. Nature will win and quicker than you think. The most we've ever done is maybe rake some duff in a rutted area and pull small limbs and debris into it. Limbs were primarily used to indicate this area is closed and to make removing it all a bigger pain than taking the newly routed trail.