WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    Default BA Fly Creek UL1 or 2 ?

    I've recently come into some "extra" money, so am looking at upgrading tents. currently packing the Sierra Flashlight 1, which is ok, but just ok. Looking at the Big Agnes Fly Creek UL1, but then I saw it and thought about the 2, for bringing the gear in, potentially sharing with someone in an emergency, more elbow room, etc. The weight differential is only a few ounces, and I'd still be lighter than the current tent. Anyone have any experience with the Fly Creek UL1? Wish you'd bought the 2?

  2. #2
    Wanna-be hiker trash
    Join Date
    03-05-2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    6,922
    Images
    78

    Default

    I used a BA Fly creek UL1 for a couple of years and I honestly hated the thing. The front entry sucked, it's usable floorspace was smaller than the stated footprint area, and it was not tall enough for me to sit up in, which while admittedly personal preference was a big problem to me. I ended up switching it out for a Tarptent double rainbow and am much happier. If you are dead-set on the Fly Creek I would definitely say go for the 2 person model. Several of my friends had the UL2 and were much happier with it than I was with the UL1 and for the minimal weight difference it will greatly improve your comfort. If you are still considering other models I would also suggest that you check out the Big Agnes Copper Spur, which has a side entry design that I like better, or check out comparable tents from a cottage manufacturer such as Tarptent, lightheartgear zpacks, etc.
    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

  3. #3
    Registered User evyck da fleet's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-24-2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    516

    Default

    I have a 1 and thought about whether I'd rather have purchased the 2. I don't have a problem fitting all my gear in it. In an emergency I'm sure I could fit someone else in there, not comfortably, but in an emergency yes. What don't I like? Not being able to sit up sometimes, that it is more triangular than rounded like the 2 which comes into play when above treeline in the wind and making sure that if its raining and windy I'm not pressed up against the side so the fly can stick against it and transfer water inside. That being said, I bought it to thru hike not camp. I'm not cramped, it doesn't prevent me from tenting above treeline in the wind and I didn't want to pay an extra $100 or whatever the difference was to add ounces. Is it a perfect tent? No, but it does everything I require and doesn't take up much space which allows me to camp in places a larger tent would not.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-19-2005
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    3,715
    Images
    3

    Default

    I owned both a one and the 2 and I echo what the elf is saying.....

    Seemed cramped even in the 2 for one person...

    Front entry I do not like...

    And also bought a rainbow to use.....

    I would also suggest copper spur or the hubba or a rainbow or even a six moon lunar solo...

  5. #5
    Registered User 4eyedbuzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-02-2007
    Location
    DFW, TX / Northern NH
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,143
    Images
    27

    Default

    Worth noting - most people in both this thread and in other threads who have purchased a Fly Creek wished they had purchased a Copper Spur instead. The most repeated comments are that users prefer the CS side entry over the FC end entry, the CS's more vertical walls, and the CS's larger vestibule.

  6. #6

    Default

    If you're not dead set on the Fly Creek series, consider the Nemo Hornet series which is basically the same design of the Fly Creek except its side entry and is a little more roomier.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-31-2016
    Location
    Currituck NC
    Posts
    136

    Default

    The Flying Creek has moments of sucking....mainly when it's raining.

    However people choose it bc they want light. I have a 2 and can vouch id hate life in a 1.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-31-2016
    Location
    Currituck NC
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Pardon the typo above....

  9. #9
    Registered User swjohnsey's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-13-2010
    Location
    Kingsville, Texas
    Age
    77
    Posts
    2,331

    Default

    If weight wasn't a concern I would go with side entry. Since I had to carry it 2000 miles I used Flycreek UL1, had plenty of room for me and gear, 5'9".

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-07-2016
    Location
    Louisville, Ohio
    Age
    81
    Posts
    160

    Default

    I bought the Fly Creek UL2 HV at a recent REI garage sale. I agree that a side entrance would be a bit easier for my old body, but for the $150 price I can turn another 90 degrees to enter. My hiking partners have the Nemo Hornet. We can have a comparison after our hike this summer.

  11. #11

    Default

    Thanks for the info guys, I've always used a front-entry tent. The Fly Creek did seem fiddly, with some extra staking needed to get it to really expand to its official floor length and wall slope.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-07-2017
    Location
    Spartanburg, South Carolina
    Age
    39
    Posts
    173

    Default

    I just purchased the Nemo Hornet 2 and at 2lbs I can't imagine the Fly Creek. I am super happy with the Hornet. Have not had the chance to have it out in the rain yet but hope to soon.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-15-2015
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Age
    38
    Posts
    156

    Default

    I bought the Fly Creek UL1 and swapped out for the UL2. I'm short, about 5'1", but wanted to have more room for a dog and my gear inside the tent on a regular basis and the ability for the occasional second person. I don't love the front entry, but I haven't had the problems with rain that others have (even in night-long thunderstorms with strong winds).

    If I were deadset on a 1P, I would get the Copper Spur (provided you're staying with BA), but if you don't mind the "2P," I think the Fly Creek UL2 was a nice compromise on space vs weight.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •