bear spray is like bug spray, right?
bear spray is like bug spray, right?
Ooops
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I love being in the woods more than anything.....just lost the desire to kill....I can still hear the sound the bear made after being shot years later. I have nothing against ethical fair chase hunting, I love venison......I'd rather shoot with a camera these days....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't take what he said the wrong way.....nothing wrong with ETHICAL FAIR CHASE HUNTING....I'm an animal lover who just decided not to hunt anymore....yet I still eat meat...I now volunteer with a wildlife rehab facility near me....here is my latest catch, rehab and release.......
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Never draw out the death of prey." http://adventure.howstuffworks.com/o...se-hunting.htm
Hiding in a stand seems to preclude that.
Frankly, I don't know why, with all our culinary (and fabric) choices in this wealthiest of nations, one would need to kill a bear. What joy is in it (unless one's life is in mortal danger?). Do what you can to protect yourself but don't kill or maim unless absolutely necessary. Ethical hunting is a slippery slope to poaching - poachers will ask, if other hunters can do it, why can't we? And yes, there is a market in some other countries for AMERICAN bear parts. Jesus guys-from-abroad, spend the money and get some Viagra and some believing in some folkloric superstition that animal "products" will make you more virile!
Make-a-Wish has been under tremendous pressure not to grant kills to the dying. I feel for those families, I really do, having a mother who died from complications from Alzheimer's and a father who was taken young from cancer. But I believe that even dying children, as heartbreaking as their illnesses are, should not be allowed to kill a beer (and, ultimately, he wasn't).
Slippery slope.
I'm not sure your presumption ethical hunting leads to poaching is well founded. Your postulation suggest ethical driving is a slippery slope to your driving a car into a crowd at the farmers market. Ethical hunting has as much a relationship with poaching as buying gas has with holding up the gas station. Disagreeing with an activity based on personal objections is fine, connecting participants with illegal activity in a broad brush smear is a bit over the top.
Regarding bears, the population is growing in some States where trap/release is no longer a sustainable option and the population is pushing into suburban and urban areas. Since bears have few if any predators outside of man, it pretty much falls to us on how to manage the issue. There are only two ways a bear population can be controlled, nature (disease, famine) and predation. Hunting can be an effective population control mechanism with bears, as opposed to deer that herd and can develop relatively huge populations in a very short period of time. Though I do not necessarily like that option, unless a better option comes along, its all we have at the moment.
No beers were injured in formation of this post.
Best to keep in mind that no AT thru hiker has ever been killed or seriously injured by a bear.
On the other hand 5 (or 6) AT thru hikers have been murdered by another human while many miles into thier AT thru hikes.
With that in mind, a case can be made to carry a defensive spray that might be effective against the greater risk-- and to also provide some comfort (security blanket?) should you hear some strange sounds in the middle of the night that could be a bear.
Fox Labs makes some well regarded (LEO grade) products that could be carried descreatly in a hip belt pouch or in your front pocket during a hitch. O
Its all all about choices-- no righr answer. The choice should be informed by the history of bear (and human) encounters, however.
Population control = an excuse to murder.
We need to be more aggressive in rethinking housing policy, and aggressively work with cities and towns on reducing housing footprints; encourage more cluster housing (away from woods across the country); more housing in urban areas and public transportation.
My BFF lives in Grand Isle, Nebraska. She loves the idea of returning much of the Plains states to the buffalo.
We did this human encroachment thing to ourselves, the bears didn't do it to us. Why should a bear lose his life over it?
Climate scientists say that once our species is gone, the planet will recover within 100 years. Will that happen to bear populations too? How will bears protect themselves from "overpopulation [of bears]" with no people around to kill them? Maybe nature should take its course. I for one will pick up neither gun nor arrow.
I will politely remind you that this is a hiking site and neither an animal rights nor hunting site. Hikers are a very diverse bunch, there are many of us who have strong opinions on the subject on both sides however we generally refrain from debating it here because it is not an appropriate use of the forum.
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.