WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Pace

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-22-2015
    Location
    Apalachin, New York
    Posts
    9

    Default Pace

    Fit guy, not overloaded, not in a rush, not dawdling, looking for advice on expected pace for planning purposes. I get it, we're all different, just looking for thoughts. In the ADKs I go with 1.5 mph plus 30 mins per kfoot. Good rule of thumb on the AT? Go.

  2. #2

    Default

    As you say, everyone is different. 2.5 mph is a fairly typical pace on most of the AT - until you hit New England. 3 mph is a fairly brisk walk with few if any breaks.
    Follow slogoen on Instagram.

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    70
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slo-go'en View Post
    As you say, everyone is different. 2.5 mph is a fairly typical pace on most of the AT - until you hit New England. 3 mph is a fairly brisk walk with few if any breaks.
    Not to disagree with Slo, cause he's got the knowledge and experience but...if this were the case everyone would be doing 20 mile days and that's just not the case in my experience. Granted, most people are faster than me but most people also don't hike 20 mile days. Maybe, when moving they hike at 2.5 mph but then they must not be keeping it up. My experience is more like yours and the people I see seem to be going slightly more miles per day than me.

    I will admit that the prevailing answer on WB is 2.5 but I'm just not seeing those people on the trail. Yes there are many who do hike that and faster but my perception is that it is not "average".

  5. #5
    Registered User 4eyedbuzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-02-2007
    Location
    DFW, TX / Northern NH
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,143
    Images
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pyroman53 View Post
    Not to disagree with Slo, cause he's got the knowledge and experience but...if this were the case everyone would be doing 20 mile days and that's just not the case in my experience. Granted, most people are faster than me but most people also don't hike 20 mile days. Maybe, when moving they hike at 2.5 mph but then they must not be keeping it up. My experience is more like yours and the people I see seem to be going slightly more miles per day than me.

    I will admit that the prevailing answer on WB is 2.5 but I'm just not seeing those people on the trail. Yes there are many who do hike that and faster but my perception is that it is not "average".
    ^Agree with above.

    Inre OP's post: Go with what you know. 1.5 mph + 1/2 hr/1000' sounds realistic. If for thru-hiking planning, note mapman's data for thru-hiker averages, especially the second table and the miles per hiking day (MPHD). The range from toughest to easiest, section wise, is 11.4 mpd in the Whites, to 16.8 mpd in northern VA through DWG. That's the average daily pace, not including zeros, of thru-hikers who already have lots of miles of trail conditioning. If for thru-hiking planning, the trail in GA and GSMNP is tougher than many assume.

    What that all equates to in terms of average mph depends upon so many unaccounted for variables. Miles per hour pace, number of hours spent actually hiking, elevation gained, weather, terrain as it influences how much care is needed in terms of foot placement, etc. Based on an average actual hiking time of 8 hours each day (which seems pretty realistic in my experience), mapman's data would tend to suggest about a 2.0 mph or perhaps slightly faster average pace - without elevation factor.


    I often see posts and even hiking articles where people state that an average hiking pace is 3.0 mph + 1/2hr per 1000' elevation gained. I have to wonder where these people are hiking and who they are, because I see a lot of thru-hikers on the AT in the summer, and damn few come anywhere near that pace. 2.0 mph to 2.5 mph + 1/2 hr or more per 1000' (from in-shape thru-hikers) is more what I see. And section hikers are typically well under 2.0 mph.


    For reference, most of my hiking is in the Whites and VT. My walking pace on sidewalk/road is 3 to 3.5 mph. But my hiking pace on a trail is more like about 1.5 mph + 1hr/1000' in the Whites, maybe a bit quicker (as high as 1.75 mph + 1hr/1000') in VT. A lot of that difference is due simply to the nature of the footpath (steep, rocks, roots, slippery, etc.). NH is just rocky and steep, VT tends to be slippery with both roots and rocks. Maybe I can do 2.0 in SNP. And then again, maybe not . . .
    Last edited by 4eyedbuzzard; 04-04-2015 at 08:37.
    "That's the thing about possum innards - they's just as good the second day." - Jed Clampett

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-08-2012
    Location
    Brunswick, Maine
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,153

    Default

    In Maine I do about 1 mph on the worse (best) of it, 1.5 mph on the semi steep stuff, 2 mph on the semi normal stuff and 5 mph into ponds.
    In the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln

  7. #7

    Default

    I am not a fast hiker but consistent. The big unknown for daily mileage is how many hours you walk a day. I usually budget 10 hours on trail time which includes a 5 minute stop every hour and about 20 minutes for lunch. Others hike longer hours at a slower pace. Some hike longer hours at a faster pace. I ran into one retired thru hiker who hiked from sunrise to sunset. He had a slow pace but when he was in new England with 12 hours plus of daylight he covered a lot of miles. The AMC formula 2 MPH plus 1/2 hour per thousand feet of elevation tends to be conservative for day hikers used to the terrain but northbound thruhikers who haven't hiked the whites will be challenged to meet it. My daily tolerance in PA VA and NC was about 16 to 19 miles a day after 2 or 3 shorter days at the beginning of the hike. I would be hard pressed to repeat that in the whites.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-22-2015
    Location
    Apalachin, New York
    Posts
    9

    Default

    If for thru-hiking planning, the trail in GA and GSMNP is tougher than many assume.
    That's the section I'm looking at - my shelter picks seemed pretty far apart and I was looking for a sanity check as I had a couple 12 hour days based on my picks.

    When in GSMNP, I understand you need a permit, but do you need to reserve your shelters ahead of time? What if you don't make your pace and therefore don't make it to the one you planned / reserved?

  9. #9
    Registered User colorado_rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-20-2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    67
    Posts
    4,540
    Images
    3

    Default

    I like even numbers, and even though I can hold a 2.5 MPH+ pace including rest stops (and I'd say this is faster than average, at the end of the day), I just use a nice even 2MPH number and at the end of the day, is pretty close when everything is considered, including photo stops, water stops, chatting with other hikers, whatever. (It's more like 2.2-2.4 MPH, but really, 2MPH is close enough for rough planning). Using the nice even 2MPH number means I usually get to where I want to a bit earlier than planned, which is nice because there are sometimes surprises, like a full campsite or shelter.

    This is for average terrain, faster on long flats, slower in NH: we were lucky to hold 1MPH in those whites!

  10. #10

    Join Date
    05-05-2011
    Location
    state of confusion
    Posts
    9,866
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    What you cant tell from mapmans data, is the reasons for the distances hiked.

    Some carry a high amt weight, some little.
    Some push their limits, some cruise at ez pace for themself.
    Some hike 12 hrs per day, and some 8.
    Some break minmally, some take several hour long breaks during day.

    The funny things about averages, is they dont actually represent anything well.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-08-2012
    Location
    Brunswick, Maine
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MuddyWaters View Post
    The funny things about averages, is they dont actually represent anything well.
    73.6% of all statistics are made up.
    In the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-22-2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,533
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    69

    Default

    I'd say 2 mph is a good avg starting pace then it will increase as you move on.
    Take Time to Watch the Trees Dance with The Wind........Then Join In........

  13. #13
    Registered User kayak karl's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-21-2007
    Location
    Swedesboro, NJ
    Age
    68
    Posts
    5,339
    Images
    25

    Default

    a guy one time bragged about his 3.5 mph one night. next night 3.8 mph. next night 3.6 mph. i said "if you are so fast, why are you where i am every night. shouldn't you be miles down the trail?"
    i found that miles per week was more helpful with planning.
    I'm so confused, I'm not sure if I lost my horse or found a rope.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chumps Later View Post
    That's the section I'm looking at - my shelter picks seemed pretty far apart and I was looking for a sanity check as I had a couple 12 hour days based on my picks.

    When in GSMNP, I understand you need a permit, but do you need to reserve your shelters ahead of time? What if you don't make your pace and therefore don't make it to the one you planned / reserved?
    Yes, you need a permit and reserve a spot in each shelter. If your in half decent shape the park can be traversed in 5 nights, 6 days. The section north of New Found gap is easier then the southern end. Plan 3 nights south of New Found gap and 2 nights north. That gives you an "average" day of just shy of 12 miles/day or 6 to 8 hours hiking. Plenty of time of a long lunch or to take in the views along the way.

    There should be no reason not to make your designated shelter, even if you have to crawl there in the dark. The only excuse is if you have a medical emergency or get caught in a blizzard.
    Follow slogoen on Instagram.

  15. #15
    Registered User 4eyedbuzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-02-2007
    Location
    DFW, TX / Northern NH
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,143
    Images
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chumps Later View Post
    That's the section I'm looking at - my shelter picks seemed pretty far apart and I was looking for a sanity check as I had a couple 12 hour days based on my picks.

    When in GSMNP, I understand you need a permit, but do you need to reserve your shelters ahead of time? What if you don't make your pace and therefore don't make it to the one you planned / reserved?
    Okay, a bit of confusion. You posted this in Thru-Hiker Specific Topics, so I kind of assumed you were thru-hiking or at least doing a pretty long section. Where are you starting and ending your section hike? If starting 50 miles from and ending 50 miles after GSMNP you would be considered a thru-hiker per GSMNP regs and not have to reserve shelters, but you do have to get an AT Thru-Hiker Permit https://smokiespermits.nps.gov/index...PermitTypeID=2 If not, then you need to reserve shelters and get a Backcountry Permit https://smokiespermits.nps.gov/index.cfm?BCPermitTypeID=1
    Last edited by 4eyedbuzzard; 04-04-2015 at 19:15. Reason: clarify need for thru-hiker permit
    "That's the thing about possum innards - they's just as good the second day." - Jed Clampett

  16. #16

    Default

    I was usually walking a consistent 2 mph when hiking the AT (except in the Whites and southern ME). However the difference was that when I started out, it was 2 mph, plus break times (so averaging less than 2 mph overall) vs. later when I was in better condition I hiked 2 mph including breaks, so 16 miles would take me 9 or so hours in the beginning but only 8 later on. On western trails, with lighter packs and easier grade, I hiked faster, but still usually only about 2.5 mph.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-22-2015
    Location
    Apalachin, New York
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Now I feel better, I read that wrong, I thought everybody needed reservations, thru hikers too.

    thanks for all the info

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chumps Later View Post
    Now I feel better, I read that wrong, I thought everybody needed reservations, thru hikers too.

    thanks for all the info
    If your a thru hiker, you still need to buy a permit ($20) and you still have to stay in a shelter, but you don't have to specify which ones in advance and your allowed 8 days to make it from one end to the other, which gives you a day to drop into Gatlinburg if you want.
    Follow slogoen on Instagram.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-29-2006
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Age
    60
    Posts
    2,018

    Default

    If I'm doing a 20+ mile day I find that by the end of the day I average 2.25 MPH (including breaks).
    Pain is a by-product of a good time.

  20. #20
    Registered User soulrebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-17-2005
    Location
    St. Pete, FL
    Age
    50
    Posts
    428
    Images
    31

    Default

    2mph + 30mins for every 1000 vertical up. If yer fit, more than likely you will walk a solid 3mph and then take a 10-20 min break every hour. So you end up averaging 2 mph.
    See ya when I get there.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •