I hear you on where the state of Scouting has come. Lawsuits over and over as this organization has been attacked have foisted a set of rules that almost removes the very stimulation we're trying to give the boys through challenge. But I say almost. Creative leaders still find ways to succeed. Lazy leaders...well...
My CUB scouts go on hikes on the AT of several miles a pop. We go bike riding. We go overnight camping (within regs). We have campfires at least 6 times a year with marshmallows and fire building instruction with flint and steel (within regs). And so much more. But every pack, den, troop, unit is different and it depends heavily on the leadership since we are all volunteer.
When I was out on a training hike with my kids a couple weekends ago I bumped into two separate troops out hiking overnight. They were all from eastern Virginia, well away from home. They were largely polite and clearly some were more experienced and some were just learning the ropes. Good. That's what it's for. But, of course, not all troops as you put it fh are going to that level of effort. Again, the reality of a volunteer-based organization. You get out of it what you put into it.
With all the reduction in risk I've seen over the years in Scouting, I see it as my duty to do my best to prepare the boys within and in spite of the evolving limitations we endure. That is the challenge to scouting's leadership as we move forward. To me (and no intended judgment here) that is better than checking out of the system and letting it have its way. These boys need leaders who can challenge them and I fear too many would be awesome leaders see the rules and assume it's all kid gloves and no risk all the time. My two cents.
Back on topic, there is still a dearth of actual information on this original story. Honestly, who really knows what happened outside "they called 911." I'm suspending judgment until more is known. Now those guys that toppled the Hoodoo on the other hand...